Table 3. Comparison of response to second-line agents on the basis of steroid responsiveness

Second-Line Agent Total No. Treateda Steroid Dependent (n) Steroid Resistant (n) Pb

Cyclophosphamide 20 5 4
    total remission (n [%]) 11 (55) 4 (80) 2 (50) 0.081
    complete (n) 8 3 1
    partial (n) 3 1 1
Cyclosporine 39 8 20
    total remission (n [%]) 24 (61) 6 (75) 9 (45) 0.064
    complete (n) 14 5 4
    partial (n) 10 1 5
Tacrolimus 4 2 2
    total remission (n [%]) 3 (75) 2 (100) 1 (50) 0.076
    complete (n) 1 1 0
    partial (n) 2 1 1
Mycophenolate mofetil 14 7 4
    total remission (n [%]) 9 (64) 6 (86) 1 (25) 0.055
    complete (n) 5 4 0
    partial (n) 4 2 1
All agents combined 77 22 30
    total remission (n [%]) 47 (61) 18 (82) 13 (43) 0.010
    complete (n) 28 13 5
    partial (n) 18 5 8

a Total no. treated includes all patients who were treated for any indication, including steroid resistance or dependence, partial response to steroids, frequent relapses, or toxicity/contraindications to steroids.

b Steroid dependent versus steroid resistant.